FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 242 vs Hastelloy X

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 242 and Hastelloy X are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 242 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 805 MPa (117 ksi) against 755 MPa (110 ksi) for Hastelloy X, about 7% more. Alloy 242 is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 43% for Hastelloy X, and Alloy 242 is harder (215 HB vs 195 HB). Hastelloy X is lighter (8.22 g/cm³ vs 9.05 g/cm³ for Alloy 242) and Alloy 242 is stiffer (217 GPa vs 205 GPa). On the shop floor, Hastelloy X welds better (excellent vs good) and Hastelloy X sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Alloy 242 (high, $$$$).

Alloy 242Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Hastelloy XChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Alloy 242 vs Hastelloy X: properties

Alloy 242Hastelloy X

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

217 GPa31.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

805 MPa117 ksi
755 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

375 MPa54.4 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

48%
43%

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
100 J73.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
90 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
205 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 190 GPa27.6 Msi · Reduction in Area 55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.05 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³
8.22 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,320°C2,408 °F
1,260°C2,300 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,353°C2,467 °F
1,355°C2,471 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

9 W/m·K5.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9.1 W/m·K5.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

398 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.2 µm/m·K6.2 µin/in·°F
13.9 µm/m·K7.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

815°C1,499 °F
1,150°C2,102 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
1.18×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
76 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

60 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 18 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12% · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb
215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
13.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb
520 L/kg62.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
316 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.5 mm²/s
2.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHastelloy XAlloy 242

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 242Hastelloy X
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Solution Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 242 vs Hastelloy X — frequently asked

Is Alloy 242 stronger than Hastelloy X?

Yes. Alloy 242 has a typical tensile strength of 805 MPa (117 ksi) against 755 MPa (110 ksi) for Hastelloy X — about 7% more.

Which is cheaper, Alloy 242 or Hastelloy X?

Hastelloy X is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Alloy 242 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Alloy 242 or Hastelloy X?

Hastelloy X. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against good (60/100) for Alloy 242.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 242 and Hastelloy X side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.