FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 242 vs Alloy 59

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 242 and Alloy 59 are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 242 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 805 MPa (117 ksi) against 740 MPa (107 ksi) for Alloy 59, about 9% more. Alloy 242 is harder — 215 HB against 200 HB for Alloy 59 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Alloy 59 is lighter (8.6 g/cm³ vs 9.05 g/cm³ for Alloy 242) and Alloy 59 runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 815°C continuous). On the shop floor, Alloy 59 welds better (excellent vs good) and Alloy 59 forms better (very good vs good).

Alloy 242Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Alloy 59Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Alloy 242 vs Alloy 59: properties

Alloy 242Alloy 59

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

217 GPa31.5 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

190 GPa27.6 Msi
184 GPa26.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

805 MPa117 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

375 MPa54.4 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

48%
50%

Reduction in Area

55%
65%

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
92 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
210 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.05 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³
8.6 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,320°C2,408 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,353°C2,467 °F
1,360°C2,480 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

9 W/m·K5.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.4 W/m·K6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

398 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.2 µm/m·K6.2 µin/in·°F
12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

815°C1,499 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
1.29×10⁻⁶ Ω·m50.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
93 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 18 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb
180 MJ/kg77,386 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 14 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
309 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.5 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 242Alloy 59

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 242Alloy 59
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 242 vs Alloy 59 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 242 stronger than Alloy 59?

Yes. Alloy 242 has a typical tensile strength of 805 MPa (117 ksi) against 740 MPa (107 ksi) for Alloy 59 — about 9% more.

Which is cheaper, Alloy 242 or Alloy 59?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Alloy 242 or Alloy 59?

Alloy 59. Its weldability rates excellent (88/100) against good (60/100) for Alloy 242.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 242 and Alloy 59 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.