FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 242 vs Alloy 30

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 242 and Alloy 30 are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 242 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 375 MPa (54.4 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for Alloy 30, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 805 MPa (117 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, Alloy 30 is the more ductile: elongation 58% versus 48% for Alloy 242, and Alloy 242 is harder (215 HB vs 170 HB). Alloy 30 is lighter (8.22 g/cm³ vs 9.05 g/cm³ for Alloy 242) and Alloy 242 is stiffer (217 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 30 welds better (very good vs good).

Alloy 242Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Alloy 30Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Alloy 242 vs Alloy 30: properties

Alloy 242Alloy 30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

217 GPa31.5 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

190 GPa27.6 Msi
167 GPa24.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

805 MPa117 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

375 MPa54.4 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

48%
58%

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
87 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.05 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³
8.22 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,320°C2,408 °F
1,290°C2,354 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,353°C2,467 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

9 W/m·K5.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.1 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

398 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
435 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.2 µm/m·K6.2 µin/in·°F
12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

815°C1,499 °F
675°C1,247 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
1.18×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.12 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12% · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb
140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
84 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24 MN·m/kg
24.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
256 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.5 mm²/s
2.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 242Alloy 30

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 242Alloy 30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 242 vs Alloy 30 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 242 stronger than Alloy 30?

Yes. Alloy 242 has a typical yield strength of 375 MPa (54.4 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for Alloy 30 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 805 MPa (117 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 242 or Alloy 30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 242 or Alloy 30?

Alloy 30, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 18/100 for Alloy 242; for welding the order is Alloy 30 first (very good, 80/100) then Alloy 242 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 242 and Alloy 30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.