FabDigitFabDigit

Magnesium Alloy QE22A vs ZM4

Magnesium Alloy · grade comparison

Magnesium Alloy QE22A and ZM4 are both magnesium alloy grades. QE22A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for ZM4, about 95% more; tensile strength follows at 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi). QE22A is harder — 80 HB against 55 HB for ZM4 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. QE22A runs hotter in service (250°C vs 175°C continuous).

QE22AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

QE22A vs ZM4: properties

QE22AZM4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

17 GPa2.5 Msi
16.5 GPa2.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
13 MPa·√m11.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
55 HB

Reduction in Area

—
4%

Hardness, Vickers

—
57 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 45 GPa6.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Elongation at Break 3%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.82 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.83 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

549°C1,020 °F
510°C950 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

26.7 µm/m·K14.8 µin/in·°F
26.5 µm/m·K14.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 370 J/g159 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.68 µΩ·in
6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 25 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-1.55 V
-1.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 92 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 400% · Castability 78 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

370 MJ/kg159,072 BTU/lb
320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

32 kg CO₂/kg
30 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

143 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.2 MN·m/kg
24 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

432 kJ/m³
114 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

62.1 mm²/s
60.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every magnesium alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

701001502001.41.51.61.71.8Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleQE22AZM4

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityQE22AZM4
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

QE22A vs ZM4 — frequently asked

Is QE22A stronger than ZM4?

Yes. QE22A has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for ZM4 — about 95% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, QE22A or ZM4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, QE22A or ZM4?

QE22A. Its weldability rates good (65/100) against good (60/100) for ZM4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in QE22A and ZM4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.