FabDigitFabDigit

Borofloat 33 vs Pyroceram 9606

Glass · grade comparison

Borofloat 33 and Pyroceram 9606 are both glass grades. Pyroceram 9606 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33, about 3.4 times as much. Pyroceram 9606 is harder — 700 HV against 480 HV for Borofloat 33 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Borofloat 33 is lighter (2.23 g/cm³ vs 2.6 g/cm³ for Pyroceram 9606) and Pyroceram 9606 is stiffer (120 GPa vs 64 GPa). On the shop floor, Borofloat 33 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Pyroceram 9606 (high, $$$$).

Borofloat 33Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Pyroceram 9606Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Borofloat 33 vs Pyroceram 9606: properties

Borofloat 33Pyroceram 9606

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

64 GPa9.3 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.7 GPa3.9 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,250 MPa181 ksi

Flexural Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.77 MPa·√m0.7 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

480 HV
700 HV

Hardness, Knoop

480 HK
698 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6
6.5

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.23 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.6 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.471
—

Light Transmission

92%
0%

Melting Point (Solidus)

—
1,350°C2,462 °F

Same in both: Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
3.6 W/m·K2.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
800 J/kg·K0.19 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3.3 µm/m·K1.8 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
5.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0037
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
70 / 100

Sintering / Firing Temperature

—
1,200°C2,192 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb
25 L/kg3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

16 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.7 MN·m/kg
46.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
1.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBorofloat 33

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBorofloat 33Pyroceram 9606
Default conditionAnnealed Glass—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Borofloat 33 vs Pyroceram 9606 — frequently asked

Is Pyroceram 9606 stronger than Borofloat 33?

Yes. Pyroceram 9606 has a typical tensile strength of 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33 — about 3.4 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Borofloat 33 or Pyroceram 9606?

Borofloat 33 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Pyroceram 9606 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Borofloat 33 or Pyroceram 9606?

Borofloat 33, by a small margin. Both rate not recommended for machinability — 12/100 against 5/100 for Pyroceram 9606.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Borofloat 33 and Pyroceram 9606 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.