FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy Cu-OF vs CuNi2SiCr

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy Cu-OF and CuNi2SiCr are both copper alloy grades. CuNi2SiCr is the stronger of the two: yield strength 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for Cu-OF, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi). In exchange, Cu-OF is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 12% for CuNi2SiCr, and CuNi2SiCr is harder (190 HB vs 65 HB). CuNi2SiCr is stiffer (132 GPa vs 115 GPa) and CuNi2SiCr runs hotter in service (350°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, CuNi2SiCr machines more easily (fair vs poor).

Cu-OFChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CuNi2SiCrChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Cu-OF vs CuNi2SiCr: properties

Cu-OFCuNi2SiCr

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
132 GPa19.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
12%

Reduction in Area

55%
30%

Shear Strength

155 MPa22.5 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
200 HV

Compressive Strength

—
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
91 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

340 W/m·K196 BTU/hr·ft·°F
160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

88 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.96×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.772 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
15 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

98 kJ/m³
947 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

98.8 mm²/s
47.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

38
41

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCu-OFCuNi2SiCr

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCu-OFCuNi2SiCr
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

Cu-OF vs CuNi2SiCr — frequently asked

Is CuNi2SiCr stronger than Cu-OF?

Yes. CuNi2SiCr has a typical yield strength of 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for Cu-OF — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Cu-OF or CuNi2SiCr?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Cu-OF or CuNi2SiCr?

CuNi2SiCr. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (20/100) for Cu-OF; for welding the order is Cu-OF first (good, 55/100) then CuNi2SiCr (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Cu-OF and CuNi2SiCr side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.