FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CuNi2SiCr vs GRCop-42

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CuNi2SiCr and GRCop-42 are both copper alloy grades. CuNi2SiCr is the stronger of the two: yield strength 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for GRCop-42, about 82% more; tensile strength follows at 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 455 MPa (66 ksi). In exchange, GRCop-42 is the more ductile: elongation 33% versus 12% for CuNi2SiCr, and CuNi2SiCr is harder (200 HV vs 132 HV). CuNi2SiCr is stiffer (132 GPa vs 120 GPa) and GRCop-42 runs hotter in service (700°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, GRCop-42 machines more easily (good vs fair) and GRCop-42 welds better (good vs fair).

CuNi2SiCrChoose it when strength drives the design.

GRCop-42Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

CuNi2SiCr vs GRCop-42: properties

CuNi2SiCrGRCop-42

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

132 GPa19.1 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

600 MPa87 ksi
455 MPa66 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
33%

Reduction in Area

30%
45%

Compressive Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
—

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

91 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
132 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,050°C1,922 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
390 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
700°C1,292 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
80 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.85 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
52 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

50 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
51 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15 MN·m/kg
13.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

947 kJ/m³
315 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

47.8 mm²/s
92.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

41
71

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGRCop-42CuNi2SiCr

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCuNi2SiCrGRCop-42
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CuNi2SiCr vs GRCop-42 — frequently asked

Is CuNi2SiCr stronger than GRCop-42?

Yes. CuNi2SiCr has a typical yield strength of 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for GRCop-42 — about 82% more. Tensile strength is 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 455 MPa (66 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CuNi2SiCr or GRCop-42?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CuNi2SiCr or GRCop-42?

GRCop-42. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for CuNi2SiCr; for welding the order is GRCop-42 first (good, 60/100) then CuNi2SiCr (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CuNi2SiCr and GRCop-42 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.