FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs C95520

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and C95520 are both copper alloy grades. C95520 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 725 MPa (105 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500, about 142% more; tensile strength follows at 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, C95500 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 6% for C95520, and C95520 is harder (302 HB vs 192 HB). C95520 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa) and C95500 conducts electricity better (8.5 % IACS vs 7 % IACS). On the shop floor, C95500 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C95500 welds better (good vs fair), and C95520 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95520Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C95500 vs C95520: properties

C95500C95520

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
965 MPa140 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
725 MPa105 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
6%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
302 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
—

Reduction in Area

—
8%

Compressive Strength

—
800 MPa116 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
32 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
315 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
1,044°C1,911 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
1,074°C1,965 °F

Same in both: Density 7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V · Corrosion Resistance 80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
30%

Weldability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.2 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
128 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
15.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
2,246 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
21

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 13.3 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C95520

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500C95520
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs C95520 — frequently asked

Is C95520 stronger than C95500?

Yes. C95520 has a typical yield strength of 725 MPa (105 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500 — about 142% more. Tensile strength is 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or C95520?

C95520 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or C95520?

C95500. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (28/100) for C95520; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C95520 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and C95520 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.