FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C94700 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C94700 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for C94700, about 82% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi). In exchange, C94700 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 85 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.75 g/cm³ for C94700) and C94700 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, C95500 welds better (good vs fair) and C94700 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C94700Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C94700 vs C95500: properties

C94700C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

122 GPa17.7 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
8%

Compressive Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
—

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

45 HRB
92 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

975°C1,787 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

46.7 W/m·K27 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.18 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
50%

Weldability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.4 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

116 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14.2 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C94700

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC94700C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C94700 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C94700?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for C94700 — about 82% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C94700 or C95500?

C94700 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C94700 or C95500?

C95500, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 40/100 against 35/100 for C94700; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C94700 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C94700 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.