FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs C94700

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and C94700 are both copper alloy grades. C94700 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). C94700 is harder — 85 HB against 55 HB for C84800 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C94700 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 86 GPa) and C94700 runs hotter in service (260°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs fair), C94700 welds better (fair vs poor), and C94700 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

C94700Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C84800 vs C94700: properties

C84800C94700

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
85 HB

Compressive Strength

—
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
45 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 35%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
975°C1,787 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
1,040°C1,904 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46.7 W/m·K27 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
260°C500 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
11 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
1.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.18 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
30%

Formability (cold)

—
15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
13.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
116 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
14.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800C94700

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800C94700
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs C94700 — frequently asked

Is C94700 stronger than C84800?

Yes. C94700 has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84800 or C94700?

C94700 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84800 or C94700?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against fair (35/100) for C94700; for welding the order is C94700 first (fair, 40/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and C94700 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.