FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C92610 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C92610 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for C92610, about 107% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). In exchange, C92610 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 70 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C92610) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, C92610 machines more easily (very good vs fair), C95500 welds better (good vs poor), and C92610 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C92610Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C92610 vs C95500: properties

C92610C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

145 MPa21 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
8%

Reduction in Area

20%
—

Compressive Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
—

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

28 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

73 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

855°C1,571 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
50%

Weldability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.4 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

105 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14.5 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C92610

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC92610C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C92610 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C92610?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for C92610 — about 107% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C92610 or C95500?

C92610 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C92610 or C95500?

C92610. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (40/100) for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C92610 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C92610 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.