FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C92610

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C92610 are both copper alloy grades. C92610 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 145 MPa (21 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 32% more; tensile strength follows at 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 22% for C92610, and C92610 is harder (70 HB vs 55 HB). C92610 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 95 GPa) and C92610 runs hotter in service (260°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and C92610 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C92610Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84400 vs C92610: properties

C84400C92610

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
22%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
70 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
28 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Vickers

—
73 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
855°C1,571 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Same in both: Density 8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
11.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V · Corrosion Resistance 58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
11.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
105 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
14.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C92610

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C92610
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C92610 — frequently asked

Is C92610 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C92610 has a typical yield strength of 145 MPa (21 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 32% more. Tensile strength is 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C92610?

C92610 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C92610?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for C92610; for welding the order is C92610 first (poor, 25/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C92610 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.