FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C74400 vs C77100

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C74400 and C77100 are both copper alloy grades. C74400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for C77100, about 144% more; tensile strength follows at 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 420 MPa (60.9 ksi). In exchange, C77100 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 12% for C74400, and C74400 is harder (145 HV vs 105 HV). C77100 is stiffer (132 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C77100 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous).

C74400Choose it when strength drives the design.

C77100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C74400 vs C77100: properties

C74400C77100

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
132 GPa19.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

46 GPa6.7 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
129 GPa18.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

515 MPa74.7 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
40%

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

138 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
55 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
105 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,020°C1,868 °F
1,040°C1,904 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Same in both: Density 8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
180 J/g77.4 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.8 % IACS
4.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.76×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.93 µΩ·in
3.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m14.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.19 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
63 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

52 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.3 MN·m/kg
15.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

781 kJ/m³
123 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74400C77100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC74400C77100
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C74400 vs C77100 — frequently asked

Is C74400 stronger than C77100?

Yes. C74400 has a typical yield strength of 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for C77100 — about 144% more. Tensile strength is 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 420 MPa (60.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C74400 or C77100?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C74400 over C77100?

Pick C74400 when strength drives the design. Pick C77100 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C74400 and C77100 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.