FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70620 vs C74400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70620 and C74400 are both copper alloy grades. C74400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70620, about 3.7 times as much; tensile strength follows at 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70620 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 12% for C74400, and C74400 is harder (138 HB vs 65 HB). C70620 runs hotter in service (315°C vs 200°C continuous) and C74400 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 40 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70620 welds better (excellent vs fair).

C70620Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C74400Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70620 vs C74400: properties

C70620C74400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
12%

Reduction in Area

65%
—

Shear Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
138 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
75 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
145 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 124 GPa18 Msi · Bulk Modulus 130 GPa18.9 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,020°C1,868 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.1 µm/m·K9.5 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
9.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in
1.76×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
52 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
781 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74400C70620

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70620C74400
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70620 vs C74400 — frequently asked

Is C74400 stronger than C70620?

Yes. C74400 has a typical yield strength of 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70620 — about 3.7 times as much. Tensile strength is 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70620 or C74400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70620 or C74400?

C70620. Its weldability rates excellent (90/100) against fair (52/100) for C74400.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70620 and C74400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.