FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C71900 vs C74400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C71900 and C74400 are both copper alloy grades. C71900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for C74400, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 515 MPa (74.7 ksi). C71900 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 12% for C74400, and C71900 is harder (230 HB vs 138 HB). C71900 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C71900 runs hotter in service (320°C vs 200°C continuous).

C71900Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C71900 vs C74400: properties

C71900C74400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
12%

Reduction in Area

35%
—

Shear Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

230 HB
138 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

250 HV
145 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
75 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,200°C2,192 °F
1,020°C1,868 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,240°C2,264 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

320°C608 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.5 % IACS
9.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.3 µΩ·in
1.76×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
52 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

995 kJ/m³
781 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.5 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74400C71900

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC71900C74400
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C71900 vs C74400 — frequently asked

Is C71900 stronger than C74400?

Yes. C71900 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for C74400 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 515 MPa (74.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C71900 or C74400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C71900 over C74400?

Pick C71900 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C71900 and C74400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.