FabDigitFabDigit

Kevlar 29 vs Kevlar 49

Composite · grade comparison

Kevlar 29 and Kevlar 49 are both composite grades. Kevlar 29 is the more ductile: elongation 3.6% versus 2.4% for Kevlar 49. Kevlar 49 is stiffer (112 GPa vs 70.5 GPa) and Kevlar 29 runs hotter in service (180°C vs 160°C continuous).

Kevlar 29Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Kevlar 29 vs Kevlar 49: properties

Kevlar 29Kevlar 49

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.5 GPa10.2 Msi
112 GPa16.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,920 MPa424 ksi
3,000 MPa435 ksi

Elongation at Break

3.6%
2.4%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.36

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Water Absorption (24 h)

4%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

7%
4%

Same in both: Density 1.44 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³ · Glass Transition (Tg) 360°C680 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,420 J/kg·K0.34 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) -2 µm/m·K-1.1 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 29% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 4 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

20 / 100
—

Same in both: Machinability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

270 MJ/kg116,079 BTU/lb
280 MJ/kg120,378 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
17 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2,028 kN·m/kg
2,083 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

49 MN·m/kg
77.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index -1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityKevlar 29Kevlar 49
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Kevlar 29 vs Kevlar 49 — frequently asked

What is the difference between Kevlar 29 and Kevlar 49?

Kevlar 29 and Kevlar 49 are both composite grades. Kevlar 29 is the more ductile: elongation 3.6% versus 2.4% for Kevlar 49. Kevlar 49 is stiffer (112 GPa vs 70.5 GPa) and Kevlar 29 runs hotter in service (180°C vs 160°C continuous).

Which is cheaper, Kevlar 29 or Kevlar 49?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Kevlar 29 over Kevlar 49?

Pick Kevlar 29 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Kevlar 29 and Kevlar 49 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.