FabDigitFabDigit

IM8 vs T800H

Composite · grade comparison

IM8 and T800H are both composite grades. IM8 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 5,930 MPa (860 ksi) against 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) for T800H, about 8% more. T800H conducts heat better (35 W/m·K vs 5.4 W/m·K).

IM8Choose it when strength drives the design.

IM8 vs T800H: properties

IM8T800H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

304 GPa44.1 Msi
294 GPa42.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.27
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

5,930 MPa860 ksi
5,490 MPa796 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1.9%

Compressive Strength

2,900 MPa421 ksi
2,400 MPa348 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.79 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.81 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

5.4 W/m·K3.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.55 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F
-0.56 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

600°C1,112 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.55×10⁻⁵ Ω·m610 µΩ·in
1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

60 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
18 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

480 MJ/kg206,363 BTU/lb
500 MJ/kg214,962 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

30 kg CO₂/kg
34 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb
600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3,313 kN·m/kg
3,033 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

169.8 MN·m/kg
162.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
25.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-192
-1,167

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIM8T800H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

IM8 vs T800H — frequently asked

Is IM8 stronger than T800H?

Yes. IM8 has a typical tensile strength of 5,930 MPa (860 ksi) against 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) for T800H — about 8% more.

Which is cheaper, IM8 or T800H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose IM8 over T800H?

Pick IM8 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in IM8 and T800H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.