FabDigitFabDigit

CEM-1 vs G-3

Composite · grade comparison

CEM-1 and G-3 are both composite grades. G-3 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for CEM-1, about 72% more. CEM-1 is lighter (1.6 g/cm³ vs 1.85 g/cm³ for G-3) and G-3 is stiffer (18 GPa vs 14 GPa). On the shop floor, CEM-1 machines more easily (good vs fair).

CEM-1Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

G-3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

CEM-1 vs G-3: properties

CEM-1G-3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

14 GPa2 Msi
18 GPa2.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.18
0.17

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Compressive Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Flexural Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Flexural Modulus

16 GPa2.3 Msi
18 GPa2.6 Msi

Shear Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
480 J/m9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

90 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

105 HRM
110 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
6.5 GPa0.94 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
16 GPa2.3 Msi

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1.5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.6 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

130°C266 °F
160°C320 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.25%
1.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.8%
2.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
130°C266 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

32%
40%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.025
0.04

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω
1×10¹¹ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
125 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
42 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

91 kN·m/kg
135 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.8 MN·m/kg
9.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCEM-1G-3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CEM-1 vs G-3 — frequently asked

Is G-3 stronger than CEM-1?

Yes. G-3 has a typical tensile strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for CEM-1 — about 72% more.

Which is cheaper, CEM-1 or G-3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CEM-1 or G-3?

CEM-1. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (42/100) for G-3.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CEM-1 and G-3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.