FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs ADC3

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and ADC3 are both aluminum grades. ADC3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 127% more; tensile strength follows at 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 3.5% for ADC3, and ADC3 is harder (75 HB vs 50 HB). AC3A conducts heat better (130 W/m·K vs 113 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ADC3 machines more easily (good vs fair) and AC3A welds better (very good vs fair).

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

ADC3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

AC3A vs ADC3: properties

AC3AADC3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
3.5%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
—

Weldability

80 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
180 MJ/kg77,386 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
119 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
204 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
44.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AADC3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AADC3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs ADC3 — frequently asked

Is ADC3 stronger than AC3A?

Yes. ADC3 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 127% more. Tensile strength is 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or ADC3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or ADC3?

ADC3. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (40/100) for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then ADC3 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and ADC3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.