FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC1A vs AC3A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC1A and AC3A are both aluminum grades. AC1A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 4% for AC1A, and AC1A is harder (95 HB vs 50 HB). AC3A is lighter (2.66 g/cm³ vs 2.8 g/cm³ for AC1A) and AC1A runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, AC1A machines more easily (very good vs fair), AC3A welds better (very good vs poor), and AC3A sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AC1A (premium, $$$).

AC1AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

AC1A vs AC3A: properties

AC1AAC3A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

335 MPa48.6 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
6%

Compressive Strength

255 MPa37 ksi
—

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
50 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

545°C1,013 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

645°C1,193 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

920 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.7 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

33 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
30%

Weldability

25 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

120 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

440 kJ/m³
40 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.5 mm²/s
50.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

26
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC1AAC3A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC1AAC3A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC1A vs AC3A — frequently asked

Is AC1A stronger than AC3A?

Yes. AC1A has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC1A or AC3A?

AC3A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AC1A is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AC1A or AC3A?

AC1A. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against fair (40/100) for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then AC1A (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC1A and AC3A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.