FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs AC4B

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and AC4B are both aluminum grades. AC4B is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 2% for AC4B, and AC4B is harder (75 HB vs 50 HB). AC3A is lighter (2.66 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for AC4B) and AC3A conducts heat better (130 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, AC4B machines more easily (good vs fair) and AC3A welds better (very good vs fair).

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

AC4BChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

AC3A vs AC4B: properties

AC3AAC4B

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27.5 GPa4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
2%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
516°C961 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
604°C1,119 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-195°C-319 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.81 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
—

Weldability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Castability

95 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

70%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
82 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
40.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AAC4B

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AAC4B
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs AC4B — frequently asked

Is AC4B stronger than AC3A?

Yes. AC4B has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or AC4B?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or AC4B?

AC4B. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against fair (40/100) for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then AC4B (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and AC4B side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.