FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7075 vs Titanium Grade 5

Cross-family material comparison

Aluminum 7075 is an aluminum grade and Titanium Grade 5 is a titanium grade — different families, so density, stiffness and cost move together with strength. Grade 5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 503 MPa (73 ksi) for 7075, about 75% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 572 MPa (83 ksi). Grade 5 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 11% for 7075, and Grade 5 is harder (334 HB vs 150 HB). 7075 is lighter (2.81 g/cm³ vs 4.43 g/cm³ for Grade 5) and Grade 5 is stiffer (113.8 GPa vs 71.7 GPa). On the shop floor, 7075 machines more easily (very good vs poor) and Grade 5 welds better (very good vs poor).

7075Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Grade 5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

7075 vs Grade 5: properties

7075Grade 5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71.7 GPa10.4 Msi
113.8 GPa16.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.9 GPa3.9 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

572 MPa83 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

503 MPa73 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
14%

Reduction in Area

25%
36%

Compressive Strength

505 MPa73.2 ksi
970 MPa141 ksi

Shear Strength

331 MPa48 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
334 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
349 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
36 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

477°C891 °F
1,604°C2,919 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.7 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
526 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in
1.78×10⁻⁶ Ω·m70.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

160%
22%

Weldability

18 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

10 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
42 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

204 kN·m/kg
214 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,764 kJ/m³
3,402 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.2 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.11101001,0005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale7075Grade 5
MetalsPlasticsCeramics & glass

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability7075Grade 5
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionT6O
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm1 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
CrN—Yes
E-CoatingYes—
Electroless Nickel (EN)Yes—
Epoxy CoatingYes—
Gold PlatingYes—
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. They share 4 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, DLC, Electropolishing.

7075 vs Grade 5 — frequently asked

Is Grade 5 stronger than 7075?

Yes. Grade 5 has a typical yield strength of 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 503 MPa (73 ksi) for 7075 — about 75% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 572 MPa (83 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7075 or Grade 5?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7075 or Grade 5?

7075. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against poor (20/100) for Grade 5; for welding the order is Grade 5 first (very good, 75/100) then 7075 (poor, 18/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7075 and Grade 5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.