FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 316 vs Titanium Grade 5

Cross-family material comparison

Stainless Steel 316 is a stainless steel grade and Titanium Grade 5 is a titanium grade — different families, so density, stiffness and cost move together with strength. Grade 5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 316, about 3.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, 316 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 14% for Grade 5, and Grade 5 is harder (334 HB vs 150 HB). Grade 5 is lighter (4.43 g/cm³ vs 8 g/cm³ for 316) and 316 is stiffer (193 GPa vs 113.8 GPa). On the shop floor, 316 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 316 welds better (excellent vs very good).

316Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

316 vs Grade 5: properties

316Grade 5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
113.8 GPa16.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

166 GPa24.1 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
14%

Reduction in Area

65%
36%

Compressive Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
970 MPa141 ksi

Shear Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
334 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
349 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
36 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,375°C2,507 °F
1,604°C2,919 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.7 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
526 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in
1.78×10⁻⁶ Ω·m70.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

76 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
22%

Weldability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.1 kg CO₂/kg
42 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
214 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.1 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

218 kJ/m³
3,402 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.11101001,0005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale316Grade 5
MetalsPlasticsCeramics & glass

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability316Grade 5
Casting & forgingYes—
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionSolution AnnealedO
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm1 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Black OxideYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
Electroless Nickel (EN)Yes—
Epoxy CoatingYes—
Gold PlatingYes—
Hard Chrome PlatingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—
PicklingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Silver PlatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. They share 19 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, CrN, DLC, Electropolishing, HVOF Coating, MoS2, Multilayer CVD and 7 more.

316 vs Grade 5 — frequently asked

Is Grade 5 stronger than 316?

Yes. Grade 5 has a typical yield strength of 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 316 — about 3.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 316 or Grade 5?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 316 or Grade 5?

316. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (20/100) for Grade 5; for welding the order is 316 first (excellent, 88/100) then Grade 5 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 316 and Grade 5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.