FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2024 vs 7075

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2024 and 7075 are both aluminum grades. 7075 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 345 MPa (50 ksi) for 2024, about 46% more; tensile strength follows at 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 483 MPa (70.1 ksi). In exchange, 2024 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 11% for 7075, and 7075 is harder (150 HB vs 120 HB). 2024 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous).

2024Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

7075Choose it when strength drives the design.

2024 vs 7075: properties

20247075

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

73.1 GPa10.6 Msi
71.7 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
26.9 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

483 MPa70.1 ksi
572 MPa83 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

345 MPa50 ksi
503 MPa73 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
11%

Compressive Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
505 MPa73.2 ksi

Shear Strength

283 MPa41 ksi
331 MPa48 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

138 MPa20 ksi
159 MPa23.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

37 MPa·√m33.7 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

137 HV
175 HV

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

502°C936 °F
477°C891 °F

Liquidus Temperature

638°C1,180 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.9 µm/m·K12.7 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in
5.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.69 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
160%

Weldability

20 / 100
18 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

10 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

174 kN·m/kg
204 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.3 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

814 kJ/m³
1,764 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

49.7 mm²/s
48.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
44

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70752024

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20247075
Default conditionT3T6
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2024 vs 7075 — frequently asked

Is 7075 stronger than 2024?

Yes. 7075 has a typical yield strength of 503 MPa (73 ksi) against 345 MPa (50 ksi) for 2024 — about 46% more. Tensile strength is 572 MPa (83 ksi) vs 483 MPa (70.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2024 or 7075?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2024 or 7075?

7075, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 72/100 for 2024.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2024 and 7075 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.