FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7003 vs 7N01

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7003 and 7N01 are both aluminum grades. 7003 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for 7N01, about 11% more. In exchange, 7N01 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 11% for 7003. 7003 conducts electricity better (39 % IACS vs 35 % IACS). On the shop floor, 7003 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 7N01 (premium, $$$).

7003Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

7N01Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

7003 vs 7N01: properties

70037N01

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
355 MPa51.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
13%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
33 MPa·√m30 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 105 HB · Hardness, Vickers 112 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

605°C1,121 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.86 V
-0.84 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
48 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
60%

Weldability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
128 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

709 kJ/m³
580 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

61.7 mm²/s
56 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
30

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.2 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70037N01

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70037N01
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7003 vs 7N01 — frequently asked

Is 7003 stronger than 7N01?

Yes. 7003 has a typical yield strength of 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for 7N01 — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) vs 355 MPa (51.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7003 or 7N01?

7003 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 7N01 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 7003 or 7N01?

7N01. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (75/100) for 7003.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7003 and 7N01 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.