FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6061 vs 6106

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6061 and 6106 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. 6061 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for 6106, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi). 6061 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for 6106, and 6061 is harder (95 HB vs 80 HB). 6061 runs hotter in service (170°C vs 150°C continuous) and 6106 conducts heat better (190 W/m·K vs 167 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6061 machines more easily (very good vs fair).

6061Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6061 vs 6106: properties

60616106

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
69.5 GPa10.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

276 MPa40 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Reduction in Area

40%
—

Compressive Strength

276 MPa40 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Shear Strength

207 MPa30 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

96 MPa13.9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

107 HV
85 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

582°C1,080 °F
615°C1,139 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

167 W/m·K96.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

170°C338 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

43 % IACS
49 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.99×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in
3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.82 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
130%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

115 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

553 kJ/m³
348 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69 mm²/s
78.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
31

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60616106

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60616106
Default conditionT6—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6061 vs 6106 — frequently asked

Is 6061 stronger than 6106?

Yes. 6061 has a typical yield strength of 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for 6106 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6061 or 6106?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6061 or 6106?

6061. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (50/100) for 6106; for welding the order is 6061 first (excellent, 85/100) then 6106 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061 and 6106 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.