FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6061 vs Magnesium Alloy AZ31B

Cross-family material comparison

Aluminum 6061 is an aluminum grade and Magnesium Alloy AZ31B is a magnesium alloy grade — different families, so density, stiffness and cost move together with strength. 6061 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for AZ31B, about 84% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 255 MPa (37 ksi). In exchange, AZ31B is the more ductile: elongation 21% versus 12% for 6061, and 6061 is harder (95 HB vs 49 HB). AZ31B is lighter (1.77 g/cm³ vs 2.7 g/cm³ for 6061) and 6061 is stiffer (68.9 GPa vs 45 GPa). On the shop floor, AZ31B machines more easily (excellent vs very good), 6061 welds better (excellent vs very good), and 6061 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than AZ31B (standard, $$).

6061Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AZ31BChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

6061 vs AZ31B: properties

6061AZ31B

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
17 GPa2.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
35 GPa5.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

276 MPa40 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
21%

Reduction in Area

40%
—

Compressive Strength

276 MPa40 ksi
97 MPa14.1 ksi

Shear Strength

207 MPa30 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

96 MPa13.9 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in
14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
49 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
45 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

107 HV
55 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
1.77 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

582°C1,080 °F
566°C1,051 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
632°C1,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

167 W/m·K96.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
26 µm/m·K14.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
340 J/g146 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

170°C338 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

43 % IACS
18.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.99×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in
9.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.62 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-1.55 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
50 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
400%

Castability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
32 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

115 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

553 kJ/m³
250 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69 mm²/s
54.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.11101001,0005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6061AZ31B
MetalsPlasticsCeramics & glass

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6061AZ31B
Default conditionT6O
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
CerakoteYes—
DLCYes—
Electroless Nickel (EN)Yes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Epoxy CoatingYes—
Gold PlatingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
Silver PlatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. They share 7 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Painting, Powder Coating.

6061 vs AZ31B — frequently asked

Is 6061 stronger than AZ31B?

Yes. 6061 has a typical yield strength of 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for AZ31B — about 84% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 255 MPa (37 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6061 or AZ31B?

6061 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while AZ31B is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6061 or AZ31B?

AZ31B. Its machinability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (70/100) for 6061; for welding the order is 6061 first (excellent, 85/100) then AZ31B (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061 and AZ31B side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.