FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6061 vs 6081

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6061 and 6081 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. Both yield at about 276 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6061 is harder — 107 HV against 100 HV for 6081 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 6061 runs hotter in service (170°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 6061 machines more easily (very good vs good).

6061Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when the part sees heat.

6061 vs 6081: properties

60616081

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

276 MPa40 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
11%

Reduction in Area

40%
—

Compressive Strength

276 MPa40 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Shear Strength

207 MPa30 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

96 MPa13.9 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

107 HV
100 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 310 MPa45 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 95 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

582°C1,080 °F
585°C1,085 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

167 W/m·K96.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

170°C338 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

43 % IACS
42 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.99×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in
4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
150%

Castability

—
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

553 kJ/m³
548 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69 mm²/s
70 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
33

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 115 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60616081

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60616081
Default conditionT6—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6061 vs 6081 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 6061 and 6081?

Aluminum 6061 and 6081 are both aluminum grades, both multipurpose al. Both yield at about 276 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6061 is harder — 107 HV against 100 HV for 6081 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, 6061 or 6081?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6061 or 6081?

6061. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for 6081; for welding the order is 6061 first (excellent, 85/100) then 6081 (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061 and 6081 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.