FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs A383

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and A383 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for A383, about 24% more. 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3.5% for A383, and 356 is harder (80 HB vs 75 HB). 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs poor).

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs A383: properties

356A383

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
3.5%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.74 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
516°C961 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.1 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
38 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
—

Weldability

78 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 70 / 100 · Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Castability 95 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
90%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
113 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
25.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
158 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
36.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356A383

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356A383
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

356 vs A383 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than A383?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for A383 — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or A383?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 356 or A383?

356. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against poor (25/100) for A383.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and A383 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.