FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs A383

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and A383 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. A383 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). A383 is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 2% for 319, and A383 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 319 conducts heat better (109 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 319 welds better (good vs poor).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

A383Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs A383: properties

319A383

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
3.5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.74 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
516°C961 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.1 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
38 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
90%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
113 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
25.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
158 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
36.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319A383

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319A383
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

319 vs A383 — frequently asked

Is A383 stronger than 319?

Yes. A383 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or A383?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 319 or A383?

319. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (25/100) for A383.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and A383 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.