FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs A356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and A356 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for A356, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi). 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 4% for A356, and 356 is harder (80 HB vs 75 HB). On the shop floor, 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A356 (standard, $$).

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs A356: properties

356A356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
4%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 72.4 GPa10.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.4 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
4.42×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.74 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 39 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
80%

Weldability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Castability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
188 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356A356

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356A356
Casting & forging—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm1 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

356 vs A356 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than A356?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for A356 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or A356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A356 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 356 over A356?

Pick 356 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and A356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.