FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs A356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and A356 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for A356, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi). In exchange, A356 is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 75 HB). 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, A356 welds better (very good vs good) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A356 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A356Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

355 vs A356: properties

355A356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
4%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
21.4 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
4.42×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.74 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
80%

Weldability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
188 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355A356

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355A356
Casting & forging—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm1 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs A356 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than A356?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for A356 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or A356?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A356 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or A356?

A356, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 68/100 against 62/100 for 355; for welding the order is A356 first (very good, 80/100) then 355 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and A356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.