FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs A356.2

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and A356.2 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 186 MPa — strength does not separate them. On the shop floor, 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A356.2 (premium, $$$).

356Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

356 vs A356.2: properties

356A356.2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 72.4 GPa10.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 262 MPa38 ksi · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 186 MPa27 ksi · Elongation at Break 5% · Compressive Strength 190 MPa27.6 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 80 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
150%

Weldability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Castability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 98 kN·m/kg · Modulus of Resilience 239 kJ/m³ · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356A356.2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356A356.2
Default condition—T6
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

356 vs A356.2 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 356 and A356.2?

Aluminum 356 and A356.2 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 186 MPa — strength does not separate them. On the shop floor, 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A356.2 (premium, $$$).

Which is cheaper, 356 or A356.2?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A356.2 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or A356.2?

356. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (62/100) for A356.2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and A356.2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.