FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs A356.2

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and A356.2 are both aluminum grades. A356.2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). A356.2 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2% for 319, and A356.2 is harder (80 HB vs 70 HB). A356.2 is lighter (2.68 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs good), A356.2 welds better (very good vs good), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A356.2 (premium, $$$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

A356.2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs A356.2: properties

319A356.2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
80 HB

Compressive Strength

—
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
150%

Weldability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319A356.2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319A356.2
Default condition—T6
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

319 vs A356.2 — frequently asked

Is A356.2 stronger than 319?

Yes. A356.2 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or A356.2?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A356.2 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or A356.2?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (62/100) for A356.2; for welding the order is A356.2 first (very good, 80/100) then 319 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and A356.2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.