FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs 360.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and 360.0 are both aluminum grades. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) for 360.0, about 8% more. 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 360.0, and 356 is harder (80 HB vs 75 HB). 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 113 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 356 machines more easily (very good vs good), 356 welds better (very good vs poor), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 360.0 (standard, $$).

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs 360.0: properties

356360.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
324 MPa47 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
172 MPa24.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
3%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
80 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Shear Strength 179 MPa26 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
6.16×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.43 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
60%

Weldability

78 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
123 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
208 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
44.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356360.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356360.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

356 vs 360.0 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 360.0?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) for 360.0 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 324 MPa (47 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or 360.0?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 360.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or 360.0?

356. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for 360.0; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 360.0 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and 360.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.