FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs 393.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and 393.0 are both aluminum grades. 393.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 53% more; tensile strength follows at 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 0.7% for 393.0, and 393.0 is harder (140 HB vs 85 HB). 393.0 is stiffer (88 GPa vs 71 GPa) and 393.0 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs poor), 355 welds better (good vs poor), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 393.0 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

393.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

355 vs 393.0: properties

355393.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
88 GPa12.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
33 GPa4.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
0.7%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
13 MPa·√m11.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
140 HB

Reduction in Area

—
1%

Compressive Strength

—
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
76 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
147 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
555°C1,031 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
705°C1,301 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
15.8 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
500 J/g215 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.81 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
43 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
20%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
32.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
430 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
50.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355393.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355393.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

355 vs 393.0 — frequently asked

Is 393.0 stronger than 355?

Yes. 393.0 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 53% more. Tensile strength is 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or 393.0?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 393.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or 393.0?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against poor (22/100) for 393.0; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 393.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and 393.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.