FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs 390

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and 390 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 390 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 241 MPa (35 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 34% more; tensile strength follows at 279 MPa (40.5 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1% for 390, and 390 is harder (120 HB vs 85 HB). 390 is stiffer (81 GPa vs 71 GPa) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 134 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs poor), 355 welds better (good vs poor), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 390 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

390Choose it when strength drives the design.

355 vs 390: properties

355390

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
30.5 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
279 MPa40.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
241 MPa35 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
1%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
172 MPa24.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
120 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
507°C945 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
649°C1,200 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
480 J/g206 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 175°C347 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.75 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
82 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 60%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

80%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
359 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
55.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
26

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355390

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355390
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs 390 — frequently asked

Is 390 stronger than 355?

Yes. 390 has a typical yield strength of 241 MPa (35 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 34% more. Tensile strength is 279 MPa (40.5 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or 390?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 390 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or 390?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against poor (28/100) for 390; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 390 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and 390 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.