FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs 384

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and 384 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for 384, about 9% more. 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2.5% for 384. 355 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.82 g/cm³ for 384) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs poor).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

355 vs 384: properties

355384

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
2.5%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Compressive Strength

—
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 85 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
482°C900 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
580°C1,076 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 175°C347 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
38 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
130%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
95%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
117 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
192 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
35.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355384

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355384
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs 384 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than 384?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for 384 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or 384?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 355 or 384?

355. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (25/100) for 384.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and 384 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.