Aluminum 2060 vs 355
Aluminum · grade comparison
Aluminum 2060 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 2060 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 475 MPa (68.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 164% more; tensile strength follows at 505 MPa (73.2 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). 2060 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 3% for 355, and 2060 is harder (150 HB vs 85 HB). 2060 is stiffer (78 GPa vs 71 GPa) and 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs poor) and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 2060 (high, $$$$).
2060Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
355Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.
2060 vs 355: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Castability
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 60%
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 2060 | 355 |
|---|---|---|
| Sheet metal | Yes | — |
| Default condition | T81 | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $ Budget |
| Min. machined wall | 0.5 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Best machined surface | Ra 0.8 µm | Ra 0.8 µm |
Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.
2060 vs 355 — frequently asked
Is 2060 stronger than 355?
Yes. 2060 has a typical yield strength of 475 MPa (68.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 164% more. Tensile strength is 505 MPa (73.2 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).
Which is cheaper, 2060 or 355?
355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 2060 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which welds better, 2060 or 355?
355. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (20/100) for 2060.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2060 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.