FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1100 vs 2319

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1100 and 2319 are both aluminum grades. 2319 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 1100, about 60% more. 2319 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 12% for 1100, and 2319 is harder (60 HB vs 32 HB). 1100 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.84 g/cm³ for 2319) and 2319 is stiffer (73 GPa vs 69 GPa). On the shop floor, 2319 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 1100 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 2319 (premium, $$$).

1100Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

2319Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1100 vs 2319: properties

11002319

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
16%

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

48 MPa7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

32 HB
60 HB

Hardness, Vickers

35 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
543°C1,009 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
385 J/g166 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
175°C347 °F

Min Service Temperature

-273°C-459 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

57 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in
3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.64 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
55%

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

96 kJ/m³
83 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

90.6 mm²/s
69.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale11002319

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability11002319
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

1100 vs 2319 — frequently asked

Is 2319 stronger than 1100?

Yes. 2319 has a typical tensile strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for 1100 — about 60% more.

Which is cheaper, 1100 or 2319?

1100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 2319 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1100 or 2319?

2319. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (38/100) for 1100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1100 and 2319 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.