FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 224.0 vs 356

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 224.0 and 356 are both aluminum grades. 224.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356, about 48% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). 224.0 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 5% for 356, and 224.0 is harder (123 HB vs 80 HB). 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.81 g/cm³ for 224.0) and 224.0 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs poor) and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 224.0 (premium, $$$).

224.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

224.0 vs 356: properties

224.0356

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72.4 GPa10.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
5%

Compressive Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

123 HB
80 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

570°C1,058 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

38 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.68 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

150%
120%

Weldability

25 / 100
78 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

135 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

533 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48 mm²/s
58.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356224.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability224.0356
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

224.0 vs 356 — frequently asked

Is 224.0 stronger than 356?

Yes. 224.0 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356 — about 48% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 224.0 or 356?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 224.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 224.0 or 356?

224.0, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 70/100 for 356; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then 224.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 224.0 and 356 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.