FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 224.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 224.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 224.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 53% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). 224.0 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 3% for 355, and 224.0 is harder (123 HB vs 85 HB). 355 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.81 g/cm³ for 224.0) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 224.0 machines more easily (very good vs good), 355 welds better (good vs poor), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 224.0 (premium, $$$).

224.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

355Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

224.0 vs 355: properties

224.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
3%

Compressive Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

123 HB
85 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

570°C1,058 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 175°C347 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

38 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.68 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

150%
60%

Weldability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

135 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

533 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

31
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355224.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability224.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

224.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 224.0 stronger than 355?

Yes. 224.0 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 53% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 224.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 224.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 224.0 or 355?

224.0. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against good (62/100) for 355; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 224.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 224.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.