FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 213.0 vs 355

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 213.0 and 355 are both aluminum grades. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for 213.0, about 71% more; tensile strength follows at 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1.5% for 213.0, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 70 HB). 355 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for 213.0) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 120 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 213.0 machines more easily (very good vs good), 355 welds better (good vs poor), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 213.0 (standard, $$).

213.0Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

213.0 vs 355: properties

213.0355

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
3%

Compressive Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
—

Shear Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
85 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

545°C1,013 °F
546°C1,015 °F

Liquidus Temperature

627°C1,161 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 175°C347 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

28 % IACS
36 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in
4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.72 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

82 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
60%

Formability (cold)

—
5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

76 kJ/m³
228 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

45.2 mm²/s
57.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355213.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability213.0355
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

213.0 vs 355 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than 213.0?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for 213.0 — about 71% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 213.0 or 355?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 213.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 213.0 or 355?

213.0. Its machinability rates very good (82/100) against good (62/100) for 355; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then 213.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 213.0 and 355 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.