FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2117 vs 2218

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2117 and 2218 are both aluminum grades. 2218 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for 2117, about 85% more; tensile strength follows at 405 MPa (58.7 ksi) vs 295 MPa (42.8 ksi). In exchange, 2117 is the more ductile: elongation 27% versus 11% for 2218, and 2218 is harder (115 HB vs 70 HB). 2218 is stiffer (74 GPa vs 70.3 GPa) and 2218 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous).

2117Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2218Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

2117 vs 2218: properties

21172218

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.3 GPa10.2 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
405 MPa58.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

27%
11%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
115 HB

Compressive Strength

—
310 MPa45 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

554°C1,029 °F
505°C941 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
147 W/m·K84.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
38 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.31×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.7 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.64 V
-0.66 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
33 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
28 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
18 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

194 kJ/m³
629 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

63.6 mm²/s
60.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
36

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale22182117

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability21172218
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2117 vs 2218 — frequently asked

Is 2218 stronger than 2117?

Yes. 2218 has a typical yield strength of 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for 2117 — about 85% more. Tensile strength is 405 MPa (58.7 ksi) vs 295 MPa (42.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2117 or 2218?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2117 or 2218?

2218. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for 2117.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2117 and 2218 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.