FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2024 vs 7040

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2024 and 7040 are both aluminum grades, both aerospace al. 7040 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 345 MPa (50 ksi) for 2024, about 30% more. In exchange, 2024 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 10% for 7040, and 7040 is harder (145 HB vs 120 HB). 2024 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 7040 conducts heat better (154 W/m·K vs 121 W/m·K).

2024Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

7040Choose it when strength drives the design.

2024 vs 7040: properties

20247040

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

73.1 GPa10.6 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
26.9 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

483 MPa70.1 ksi
505 MPa73.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

345 MPa50 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
10%

Compressive Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
465 MPa67.4 ksi

Shear Strength

283 MPa41 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

138 MPa20 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

37 MPa·√m33.7 ksi·√in
38 MPa·√m34.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
145 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

137 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

502°C936 °F
480°C896 °F

Liquidus Temperature

638°C1,180 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
154 W/m·K89 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.9 µm/m·K12.7 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
40.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in
4.26×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.68 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.69 V
-0.84 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
90%

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

10 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

174 kN·m/kg
179 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.3 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

814 kJ/m³
1,426 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

49.7 mm²/s
63.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
47

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale20247040

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20247040
Default conditionT3—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2024 vs 7040 — frequently asked

Is 7040 stronger than 2024?

Yes. 7040 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 345 MPa (50 ksi) for 2024 — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 505 MPa (73.2 ksi) vs 483 MPa (70.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2024 or 7040?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 2024 over 7040?

Pick 2024 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat. Pick 7040 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2024 and 7040 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.