FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2017A vs 2A50

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2017A and 2A50 are both aluminum grades. 2A50 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 2017A, about 19% more. In exchange, 2017A is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 12% for 2A50, and 2017A is harder (110 HB vs 100 HB). 2A50 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2A50 conducts heat better (165 W/m·K vs 134 W/m·K).

2017AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2A50Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

2017A vs 2A50: properties

2017A2A50

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.5 GPa10.5 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

410 MPa59.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
12%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

118 HV
110 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

512°C954 °F
510°C950 °F

Liquidus Temperature

641°C1,186 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
165 W/m·K95.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

873 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

34 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.07×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.69 V · Corrosion Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

75%
150%

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

147 kN·m/kg
145 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

466 kJ/m³
677 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

55 mm²/s
68.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
41

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2017A2A50

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2017A2A50
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2017A vs 2A50 — frequently asked

Is 2A50 stronger than 2017A?

Yes. 2A50 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 2017A — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 410 MPa (59.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2017A or 2A50?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2017A or 2A50?

2017A, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 75/100 against 70/100 for 2A50; for welding the order is 2A50 first (poor, 25/100) then 2017A (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2017A and 2A50 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.