FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2007 vs 2A16

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2007 and 2A16 are both aluminum grades. 2007 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) for 2A16, about 13% more. 2A16 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 2007 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), 2A16 welds better (very good vs poor), and 2A16 forms better (fair vs poor).

2007Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

2A16Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

2007 vs 2A16: properties

20072A16

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

115 HB
110 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Compressive Strength

—
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
118 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 10%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.85 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

508°C946 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Liquidus Temperature

640°C1,184 °F
645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22.6 µm/m·K12.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 30 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.68 V
-0.66 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
33 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

95 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

300%
200%

Weldability

15 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
8%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

137 kN·m/kg
141 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

625 kJ/m³
488 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

55.1 mm²/s
50.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
31

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale20072A16

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20072A16
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2007 vs 2A16 — frequently asked

Is 2007 stronger than 2A16?

Yes. 2007 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) for 2A16 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 390 MPa (56.6 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2007 or 2A16?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2007 or 2A16?

2007. Its machinability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (70/100) for 2A16; for welding the order is 2A16 first (very good, 72/100) then 2007 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2007 and 2A16 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.