FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2007 vs 2195

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2007 and 2195 are both aluminum grades. 2195 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for 2007, about 83% more; tensile strength follows at 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) vs 390 MPa (56.6 ksi). In exchange, 2007 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 9% for 2195, and 2195 is harder (160 HB vs 115 HB). 2195 is lighter (2.71 g/cm³ vs 2.85 g/cm³ for 2007) and 2195 is stiffer (76 GPa vs 72 GPa). On the shop floor, 2007 machines more easily (excellent vs good), 2195 welds better (good vs poor), and 2007 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 2195 (high, $$$$).

2007Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

2195Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

2007 vs 2195: properties

20072195

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
29 GPa4.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
9%

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
33 MPa·√m30 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

115 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Compressive Strength

—
565 MPa81.9 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
175 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.85 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

508°C946 °F
570°C1,058 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F
115 W/m·K66.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.68 V
-0.76 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
38 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

95 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

300%
45%

Weldability

15 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
28 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Castability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

137 kN·m/kg
218 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
28 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

625 kJ/m³
1,990 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

55.1 mm²/s
47.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
41

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale20072195

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20072195
Default condition—T8
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2007 vs 2195 — frequently asked

Is 2195 stronger than 2007?

Yes. 2195 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for 2007 — about 83% more. Tensile strength is 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) vs 390 MPa (56.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2007 or 2195?

2007 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 2195 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 2007 or 2195?

2007. Its machinability rates excellent (95/100) against good (58/100) for 2195; for welding the order is 2195 first (good, 62/100) then 2007 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2007 and 2195 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.