FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1199 vs 1200

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1199 and 1200 are both aluminum grades. 1200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for 1199, about 8.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, 1199 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 9% for 1200, and 1200 is harder (32 HB vs 13 HB). 1200 is stiffer (69 GPa vs 62 GPa) and 1199 conducts electricity better (64.5 % IACS vs 57 % IACS). On the shop floor, 1200 machines more easily (fair vs poor).

1199Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

1199 vs 1200: properties

11991200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

62 GPa9 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

25 GPa3.6 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
9%

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

13 HB
32 HB

Hardness, Vickers

16 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

660°C1,220 °F
645°C1,193 °F

Liquidus Temperature

660°C1,221 °F
657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

243 W/m·K140 BTU/hr·ft·°F
226 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

64.5 % IACS
57 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.67×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.05 µΩ·in
3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
88 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1 kJ/m³
80 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

100 mm²/s
92.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale12001199

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability11991200
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Sheet metal. Both take the same 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

1199 vs 1200 — frequently asked

Is 1200 stronger than 1199?

Yes. 1200 has a typical yield strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for 1199 — about 8.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1199 or 1200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1199 or 1200?

1200. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (25/100) for 1199.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1199 and 1200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.