FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1060 vs 1200

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1060 and 1200 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 1200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060, about 3.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi). In exchange, 1060 is the more ductile: elongation 43% versus 9% for 1200, and 1200 is harder (32 HB vs 19 HB). 1060 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous).

1060Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1200Choose it when strength drives the design.

1060 vs 1200: properties

10601200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

68 GPa9.9 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
9%

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

19 HB
32 HB

Hardness, Vickers

21 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

646°C1,195 °F
645°C1,193 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

234 W/m·K135 BTU/hr·ft·°F
226 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

62 % IACS
57 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.09 µΩ·in
3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

97 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

6 kJ/m³
80 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

96.1 mm²/s
92.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
17

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10601200

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10601200
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
DLCYes—

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

1060 vs 1200 — frequently asked

Is 1200 stronger than 1060?

Yes. 1200 has a typical yield strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) for 1060 — about 3.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1060 or 1200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1060 over 1200?

Pick 1060 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat. Pick 1200 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1060 and 1200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.